Search Results for: peter

Thank You Peter Gleick

Posted on February 22, 2012 by

An open letter to Peter Gleick following his admission of dishonesty and potential crime. Dear Dr Gleick, Your recent actions have caused a lot of anguish to those affected, however, I find to my own surprise that I am somewhat … Continue reading →

Posted in News, Quotes | Tagged , , | 23 Comments

Countering Consensus Calculations

Posted on December 16, 2014 by

Guest Post by Peter Morcombe (gallopingcamel) The Kyoto Protocol Elites around the world tend to believe that rising levels of CO2 in our atmosphere will cause catastrophic climate changes.  Collectively they wield enough power to shape energy policies in many … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate | Tagged , , | 13 Comments

Robinson and Catling model closely matches data for Titan’s atmosphere

Posted on April 27, 2014 by

Posted by Peter Morcombe, April 2014 “Climate Science” is a strange discipline that makes all kinds of claims that lack any valid mathematical basis. For example, the Arrhenius hypothesis: “The selective absorption of the atmosphere is……………..not exerted by the chief … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

Challenging Arrhenius Again

Posted on March 23, 2014 by

Posted on behalf of Peter Morcombe Consensus climate scientists contend that the GHE (Greenhouse Effect) amounts to 33oC.  My definition of the GHE is the change in the average temperature of a planetary body that can be attributed to its … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate | Tagged , , | 36 Comments

The dog that did not bark

Posted on May 4, 2013 by

Guest post by Peter Morcombe Remember the case of “Silver Blaze”?  Here Sherlock Holmes discusses it with a Scotland Yard detective: Gregory: “Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?” Holmes:  “To the curious … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate Cycles, CO2 | Tagged , , , , | 32 Comments

Arrhenius Revisited

Posted on March 7, 2013 by

Guest Post by Peter Morcombe Verity Jones kindly provided a soap box for me to compare the theories of Nikolov & Zeller to those of “Climate Scientists” exemplified by Scott Denning.  If N&Z are right the huge sums of money … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate, CO2 | Tagged , , , , | 108 Comments

Unified Theory of Climate Revisited

Posted on February 16, 2013 by

Peter Morcombe copied me into an email last week asking for feedback on a reworking of his calculations on Nikolov & Zeller’s theory.  He’s had some feedback, notably from Robert G. Brown.  Peter emails: “Robert’s objections are based on dimensional … Continue reading →

Posted in Climate, CO2 | Tagged , , | 512 Comments

Climate Scientists’ Road to Hell

Posted on December 27, 2012 by

If some of Michael Mann’s followers think that prominent skeptics belong in a special circle of hell (see ‘Mannte’s Inferno‘), here’s news for them.  The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell*, as proposed by Neuroskeptic blogspot, are likely to be well … Continue reading →

Posted in Humour, Quotes, What if... | Tagged , , , , , , | 25 Comments

Cold, Wet and Miserable

Posted on May 17, 2012 by

We’re all cold, it’s wet, and I’m miserable! You probably don’t need to be told this, but May 2012 is ontrack to become the coldest for over three hundred years. It comes “hot” on the tail of the wettest April … Continue reading →

Posted in Weather | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Examining Urban Heat Islands – Part 1.

Posted on April 15, 2012 by

How cities grow Roy Spencer’s recent work (here and here) and comments by Peter Azlac got me thinking about urban heat islands (UHI) again.  I’ve been musing that so many studies show, measure or quantify UHI in various places, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Growth, Station Data, Trends | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments